
I’m saying it for the first time, but probably not the last: I am a compliant pawn of the Patriarchy. I cave to it’s wacky-ass pornographic beauty standards. I have my reasons.
Nevermind my brains, my skills, my work ethic or character: My face and body have brought me to where I am today. I was hired by red-blooded straight men in a relentlessly masculine, military engineering environment. My male supervisors are fine human beings; still, when I don’t dress up or wear makeup, they wring their hands and nervously ask me if I’m feeling okay, because “looks hot at all times” is written in invisible ink on the back of my job description. Although I am now middle aged I’m still one of the Office Hot Chicks and a reluctant Office Wife. Someday, after my training, night school, and several years of hard work I’ll be tenured and indispensible enough to say “f*ck it.” That day is not today.
I have no one to blame but myself, but my hobbies and/or moonlighting activities also require conformance to patriarchal beauty standards: Professional bellydancing, occasional artist’s modeling, and sex with the men of my social class. The bottom line is that so long as my beauty affords me temporary access to male privelege (in the form of dates, jobs, interesting experiences, gifts and cash prizes), I will invest vast quantities of time, attention and money in my face and body. This despite the knowlege that my success in this endeavor inevitably harms and alienates me from my sister-women. Game Theory offers up an explanation for why I persist at it. To quote Robin, who posted at I Blame the Patriarchy:
“If the “prize’ is to have a relationship with a man which does not obligate us to conform to sexbot standards of beauty, the best possible outcome would be achieved by full cooperation amonst all women to get off the damn train of pleasing the male gaze. This way men would have to accede to the fact of real womanhood and not pressure us to conform to the porn standard. But if there are any “betrayers”, that is women who still contort themselves to the sexbot standard, then the non-conforming/contorting women will be more likely to “lose” since men will still see the sexbot as a standard for us to aspire to. The depressing thing is that in the Prisoner’s Dilemma, according to game theory, the safest bet is to betray rather than cooperate.”
Depressing, but so true. Guilty as charged.
I am an overachiever in general. Still, at some fundamental level, I am lazy. I choose the “fix it and forget it” appproach to beauty: Plastic surgery. Laser vein and hair removal. Botox and Restalyne. I take this approach because 1) I can afford it; and 2) constant attending to imperfections real and perceived bores me beyond belief. I have better things to do than futz with myself in front of my bathroom mirror. So, if laser treatments, breast-reduction or an eye-surgery mean I don’t need to wear makeup, combat bras or glasses, I’m jill-on-the-spot with VISA card in-hand. Sign me up.
As I approach my 40th birthday I’m certain much of this blog-space will be devoted to my quest: Desperately holding on to my arm-candy status until I can no longer afford, or pull-off, the charade. That I’ve devoted this blog to life’s pleasures hides the fact that I do, in fact, have more important things to worry about than my relection in the mirror; for the most part however, you’ll never read about them. I hope this doesn’t cause me to come off as a shallow twit.
I’ve already told my teenage daughter that the day I start looking like a caricature of my former self, she is to fish me out of the dating pool and force me into retirement. I only hope that when that day comes, I’ll be able to afford to retire!
Unfortunately, she’s too busy reading fashion magazines to pay attention.






































































14 responses so far ↓
wow // March 26, 2006 at 2:52 am |
Yeah, she’ll have to drag you kicking and screaming. That’ll be amusing.
You’re pragmatic (at least as far as you think you can see in front of your face), but terrifying.
hedonisticpleasureseeker // March 26, 2006 at 3:28 pm |
Sometimes I believe nothing is more terrifying than a woman who knows exactly what she is doing.
Pony // March 27, 2006 at 2:44 am |
Hedonistic
Today I’ve been reading an excerpt from Germaine Greer’s book The Whole Woman. None of what she says is new, not to me and I’m sure not to you, but it has something to say about your stuggle. And mine.
http://content.sirsi.net/uhtbin/getenrich/0375407472/EXCERPT
Being heterosexual, wanting to love, be loved, admired, and yes, fucked by men, is the most diffuclt conundrum for a feminist. Twenty years ahead of you and I haven’t found any solution. I’ll read on. Perhaps Greer has.
Pony // March 27, 2006 at 2:56 am |
As you can see I’m not very internet savvy. The link is dead after a certain number of minutes. What? They think we’re all speed readers? Anyway it’s worthwhile to hunt down on your library’s excerpt pages.
Thanks Hedonistic, for giving us the opportunity to discuss this difficult feminist issue. It is.
hedonisticpleasureseeker // March 27, 2006 at 3:06 am |
thanks for that! I cut-and-pasted the excerpt into an email to myself, where I’ll read it at my leisure.
LiveLife // April 7, 2006 at 12:15 pm |
Interesting Write Dear…
Although I don’t necessarily agree with the philosophy behind it which accepts and does nothing about the concept of ‘be the woman that men desire whatever it takes’ instead of doing something about it. That is not what feminism and women lib intended. May be today’s women is no longer confined to home to please her men, but instead is tricked to please us (men) wherever she is: home, work, club,…. and women are fighting each other to be that image…Enjoy it while you can and call me in the morning the high wears off!
hedonisticpleasureseeker // April 7, 2006 at 10:05 pm |
Thanks for the comment, LiveLife. I hear you loud and clear. Our sexist culture was pretty clever: It co-opted some of the language of feminism and contorted it to its advantage, all the while never budging an inch on its perceived perogatives. Women are expected to be circus-performers, competing for the so-called "privelege" of being deemed suitable for men's tastes.
Herein lies the Prisoner's Dilemma: I derive income (salary, tips and cash awards, goods and services, male attention and approval) from compliance. I am a cost analyst by trade and can whip this through a little algorithm licketysplit.
Even if I assign low value to male attention and approval, and ZERO value to the generic male gaze (to which I owe nothing), I still get a good ROI (return on investment) from compliance.
I've also priced out the "cost" of noncompliance, and unfortunately, since my income depends on compliance, it's way too high.
LiveLife // April 8, 2006 at 1:41 pm |
I hear you “baby”…. Indeed it is a two way take control game and we (men as well) are manipulated with your looks and teases while we think it is our game…Sure why not take the rules to one’s own advantage than not to participate. .. I too enjoy it, but what concerns me is seeing that the tools and the means of this bilateral (or unilateral) transaction has turned in to the end goal and outcome, which leaves both sides with an empty unfullfilled feeling at the end after it’s all accomplished….and yes I do understand we live in the world of instant gratifications, life is short and nice shoes….and not worrying about long term substance.
I do and participate in the alogrithm myself and yet aware of what I really wish for……
Hedonistic Pleasureseeker » Blog Archive » Chickens Come Home to Roost // May 31, 2006 at 11:36 pm |
[...] Still, given the course of my own life, how can I tell her no? I went the academic route and found my geeky high-paying job, but I'm STILL A SLAVE. I would never have gotten this job in the first place were I not a circus performer for The Patriarchy. As a woman, there simply is NO ESCAPE. [...]
Hedonistic Pleasureseeker » Blog Archive » Sunday Google Smackdown // June 4, 2006 at 10:01 pm |
[...] beauty addict feminist Yes, believe it or not we do exist! [...]
Diary of a Shopaholic: Countdown to Liquidity « Hedonistic Pleasureseeker // August 26, 2006 at 6:52 pm |
[...] Certainly my eye-candiliciousness has scored me plenty of adventure. Still, had someone told me up front that it would cost me $15,000, would I have done it? Would I have written a check for it? Or would I have bought a new car instead? I would have been better off with the car. Yesterday my Saturn blew a fan motor, which blew out the radiator, which cost me $500 to fix. I really, really need a new car. I don’t need another fucking date with another fucking rich man. Lately they haven’t been making me very happy. A new car would make me happy. [...]
Milos // September 4, 2006 at 12:40 pm |
Since I’m an over the hill pervert and can remember the 1980’s, the decade in which my girlfriend was born, I was rather shocked to hear her dismissing feminism as irrelevant to her. As irrelevant as communism indeed.
Freedom of choice or rather “womens rights” for her, she says are just “human rights”. Notion’s like being a slave to patriarchy are just there to spoil all the fun she can have. But then she is the only Suicide Girl in Singapore, so I guess you’d say she would say that.
interesting blog, your legs do unarguably look hot. Happy 40th!
john // December 25, 2006 at 10:18 am |
Hi,
I feel so sorry for you – i never knew there was such a thing as a office wife – I cant imagine having to fulfill all those expectations it must be so hard.
Im a 40 year old guy, uni educated (computer science), nice posh private school (though poor parents), and athletic and hot looking(Yes i am ask most chicks) – yet I havent had a girlfriend for about 17 years and NOW I KNOW WHY.
I though it was me but no its just I havent been able to meet the right woman – one that could manage all my expectations and still make me a good coffee.
Ah – I long for the days when dinasours ruled and a mans cave was his castle -hmmm, anyway you get the jist.
The Office It Girl « The Hedonistic Pleasureseeker // February 27, 2009 at 1:44 am |
[...] few years ago I described myself as a “Reluctant Office Wife.” I was reluctant not because I minded the administrivia because I don’t, but because for [...]