I had to translate this one from French before I could post it: It’s INSANE! It’s a Christmas dish but why reserve it for once a year? Please! This is probably a diabetes attack just begging to happen but trust me, you’ll die happy! Here:
Divine marchioness with the chocolate for Christmas
Consistent richness… without cholesterol nor sugar!
Topics cliquables: marchioness - Anne-Laure - chocolate - pot - food film - serves - OK for health (without cholesterol nor sugar) - Christmas
As you know it, I am with my third test of reconstitution of the “marchioness to the chocolate of Anne-Laure”
- to click here to see the first test
- to click here to see the second test
• The marchioness with the chocolate of Anne-Laure is characterized mainly by the fact that it does not contain a gram of added SUGAR (it contains only glucids of the chocolate).
• It almost does not contain CHOLESTEROL either: there is only black chocolate (not cholesterol), egg white (not of cholesterol) and a little butter (112,5 cholesterol Mg for a marchioness of 500 G, therefore brought back to a share it is almost null); I finally advise you to add to it a dessertspoon (10 ml) of fresh cream reduced to bind (almost no one out of cholesterol: one can speak about “traces”).
***
This time I did everything to perfection, i.e. instead of making a “test out of test-tube” or almost, I worked out a TRUE MARCHIONESS, in sufficient quantity to fill the best possible container (that which would give the best possible form: the shape of cake, all in all), and by applying me to each stage to obtain the best possible result (the smoothest chocolate, the purest egg white…).
I thus have, in the order:
1°) selected a true POT as it is necessary (500 ml) to make beautiful sections, and I papered it food plastic film:

(just a small council: to avoid panic with the release from the mould, pass a little oil on the walls of the pot before installing plastic film, it is what I will do the next time! A few moments ago, I failed to give up unmoulding it so much the plastic adhered to the pot… and then finally it came from a blow; but with oil the release from the mould certainly would be very facilitated)
2°) bought good chocolate (of Nestle with cocoa 70%). For a pot of 500 ml, one needed 270 G of BLACK CHOCOLATE For 70% which I put to melt all gently:

3°) before adding 45 G of FRESH BUTTER to it and whipping until obtaining a perfectly smooth mixture:

Mmmmmmmm…. it is already splendid, not?

4°) then I filtered, yes FILTERED 6 EGG WHITES in a metal strainer with fine grid (practical usual of the pastrycooks chiefs of 3-stars…).
At the beginning the white did not pass in my strainer in spite of my efforts to agitate it with a spoon, then I ended up understanding that it was necessary TO ACT AS LOWER PART of the strainer, while scraping with a blade of knife: in this way, that goes very quickly and the result is perfect. It does not remain any more in the strainer but the germs, the impurities and approximately 1 spoon of very thick white which does not want to pass. Beurk! To throw without remorse.
5°)… before beating them with the whip (by adding a salt pinch, and while beating patiently, without exciting themselves - one should not almost hear the noise of the whip on the walls, the goal not being to massacre our white but to make there enter of the air… and that takes time that that takes!) :

6°) Then, I incorporated the white snows about it with the molten chocolate. It is necessary well to beat, not to worry to break the white. What one wants, it is a perfectly smooth texture.
7°) to finish and add binder, I incorporated 1 large coffee spoon very full with THICK FRESH CREAM In 4%. Why not a little more? There, it is really as it is felt…
8°) I filled the pot and I covered it, then I put it at the refrigerator (Sunday 28 à11: 45):


9°)… We had patience to wait 3 days full…
… and today Wednesday 1 to 14 H, here is the RESULT:

It is beautiful, not?
It cuts out and is held very well (smooth knife, passed under very hot water and wiped well).
It releases a rather extraordinary chocolate perfume, and Jacques, Camille and me unanimously considered to be very aromatic, very suave, and really consistent and rich… but without heaviness: incredible. Ideal.
With the dessert, one fixes rather quickly because it is filling.
But it is felt that one “is not leaded”, and it is what I adore in a dessert. One leaves table rather light, but really the saturated papillae. “There is a life after the meal! ”, as somebody would say.
Impression of lightness confirmed by a observation chimico-housewife: I had piled up in the sink the knives used to cut the sections of marchioness, and the plates on which had tasted we it. All had dried.
While passing them under water, of only one blow of sponge or brush they were clean - what one does not obtain absolutely with preparations containing of the egg yolk and/or sugar: it is always necessary to let them soak before hoping to wash them easily.
***
Assessment: cheer… 20/20, if not more. I estimate myself finally satisfied.
My contract is filled: they is SUMPTUOUS to taste and it is (almost) good for health.
Why recommend it to you for Christmas? Because in my opinion it is definitely lighter than a log after turkey or the roe-deer with chestnuts, but that at the same time it is very satisfactory for the palate and makes it possible to finish a feast on a rich and refined note. Moreover, everyone likes the chocolate, not?
I am sure that a pot of 500 G is enough largely for 8 people (only adult or children because the teenagers, it is straightforwardly another species: the quantities can vary from 1 to 10!!!).
I prepared a few moments ago, just to have fun, a plate of marchioness of Christmas: brilliant, clinquante, kitsch…: -)))
(finally, I can make quite worse than that, but for you I remained reasonable)

I believe that one will remake oneself some like that…: -)
Good appetite with all!